See Hemp Disconnected, A Psychological War for American Dependence Today at www.hotboxfilms.com

The Lockdown Turned Liberals into Nazis

Unpopular, that’s what I’ll be!

I don’t know why the pandemic lockdown turned so many of my liberal friends into Nazis, but it did. Of course, they don’t see themselves as Nazis, they just think they are doing their part to “flatten the curve” or whatever, and wish they could do more. They’re not interested in discussing the wisdom of any of the democracy-crushing measures instituted in the name of “Public Health.” If you disagree with them, it’s only because you are a stupid, selfish, racist, Trump-worshiping, flat-earther.

That’s why you cannot be trusted to make responsible decisions for yourself, and should be coerced through media censorship, economic sanctions, social pressure, and physical violence, if necessary, to comply with any and all Public Health diktats, regardless of how draconian, whether they work or not, and no matter how much harm they cause. My liberal friends tell me to shut-up, sign the papers, take the shots, and “trust the experts,” because unless we all do it, it won’t work for any of us. The absurdity of that position is completely lost on them, and they don’t realize that attitude makes them Nazis.

They don’t realize that all of a sudden they look dumber than Trump, more bigoted than the Proud Boys, and scarier than the KKK. If I hadn’t seen it with my own eyes, and experienced it first hand, I would not have believed that my liberal friends would fall for this flood of bioengineered bullshit, but they swallowed every last bit of it and they’re begging for more.

So, now I’m surrounded by liberal Jewish, feminist, LGBTQ, and SNAG Nazis, and they’re all goose-stepping right into the gas-chambers. They don’t know they’ve signed-up for a lethal injection lottery in the name of “Public Health,” but that’s exactly what they did. They don’t know that they are capitulating to global Nazism and selling their children into slavery, without a fight, but they are.

I think the lockdown did something to them. All of that time spent in mediated, propaganda-saturated, virtual environments, physically separated from other humans, must have affected their thinking. Perhaps, because of the isolation, they failed to catch the cynical smirks, outbursts of incredulity, and disbelieving eye-rolls of their peers that would have tipped them off that no part of this pandemic story was believable.

Instead, they meekly accepted the cowardly anonymity of mask and screen. They abandoned the real world for a “safe” online “experience,” and now they’re cooperating with a global Nazi coup because they are afraid of a respiratory virus. Whether the lockdown did something to them, or merely revealed something about them, it really hurts to watch it happen to my friends.

As disappointed as I am in them, and I’m very disappointed, I still consider them friends. More importantly, I still consider them people. I still recognize them as my community. I know that my fate is intimately wrapped-up with theirs, and that we need each other to survive this. That is why I speak-out about it, and that’s why I’m writing to you. I don’t care if you’re offended. I want you to know that it’s not OK to remain silent. It’s not OK to censor, and it’s not OK to comply with any more “Public Health” orders that muzzle our voices or limit our right to assemble.

Cooperating with Nazis makes you a Nazi. Cooperating with Nazis makes you an accessory to their crimes against humanity, and cooperating with Nazis will get you killed. It’s time to wake-up, friends, because that’s not how I want to remember you.

Reality Check

If you still haven’t figured out that you were lied to and robbed, rather than protected, by the pandemic response measures, you really need to look back and take stock of what happened to us over the last three years. People we trusted for years, lied to us. Amy Goodman, NPR, The New York Times, and the BBC, all of them, including our little local papers and community radio station, they all lied.

They lied about the severity of the pandemic, they lied about the necessity of lockdowns and masking and they lied about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines. They are all culpable in this crime against humanity, so they’ll eagerly cover-up and gloss over that fact any way they can.

I’m not saying that Covid isn’t real, I’m saying the response to it had an agenda other than saving lives. Instead of questioning authority and investigating the story they were told, journalists just repeated every lie they were fed, no matter how ridiculous, without question or investigation, and they censored anyone who raised questions about it. They abandoned journalism to became the hired mouthpiece of murderers while they smothered dissent in their own communities. They should have known better, and they should be held to account.

This is what an information war looks like up-close. Nobody gets paid to tell the truth anymore, so don’t waste your time with those media whores any longer. You have to evaluate the situation for yourself. You cannot “trust the experts” because the experts have all lied to you, demonstrably.

If you took any of the so-called “Covid vaccines” and remain alive, you should look back on that decision as a potentially lethal mistake, and vow never to make that mistake again. If you didn’t take the shots, congratulations, you may have the survival instincts suited for the 21st Century. Either way, it is time to face the fact that we aren’t in Kansas anymore. We now inhabit a weaponized information environment where the information you need is hidden and censored while lethal lies flourish everywhere.

In an information war, your own common sense and life experience is your strongest ally. Don’t sell it short! Here’s a few questions I’d like my liberal friends to ask themselves honestly, as a reality check on where we stand:

1. Why would you trust the government? When has the federal government ever mobilized resources, on this scale, for anything but a war? When has the government ever told us the truth about why we went to war? When the US Government mobilizes resources on this scale, even for a “humanitarian effort” you can bet your bottom dollar a lot of people are going to die somewhere. Where did you think that would be this time?

2. Why would you trust Big Pharma? Surely you’ve heard of the enormous fines Pfizer, Johnson and Johnson and others have paid for the mass slaughter of American citizens with their dangerously toxic drugs. Maybe you weren’t aware of how big pharmaceutical companies manipulate medical journals in order to protect profits, or how much their drug reps influence your doctor. Most people find out about that after their doctor’s poor judgment negatively impacts their health. If that hasn’t happened to you, consider yourself lucky, because it will if you continue to blindly trust them.

3. Why would the people who avoided eating GMOs until 2020, sign-up to become GMOs in 2021? Why did my whole, raw, vegan, organic, free-range, grass-fed, all-natural friends get injected with experimental, gene-altering, sci-fi nanotechnology? What were you thinking? What could possibly go wrong? Now that you’ve let them use you as a pincushion for a couple of years and you’ve had Covid three times since then, maybe it’s time to reconsider that decision.

4. Why would you “trust the experts”? Tony Fauci hasn’t treated a patient since his residency back in the ‘60s, and as HHS Director he has presided over the steepest decline in American’s health in the nation’s history. That’s the very best you can say about Tony Fauci!

The Gates Foundation dominates the WHO, and Director Tedros is not a doctor at all, he’s nothing but Gates’ stooge. Why would anyone trust him?

Meanwhile, the best doctors and scientists, the real experts, got censored, smeared, de-platformed and de-credentialed, for doing their jobs as doctors. Tell me you didn’t know that.

Please tell me you didn’t scream “Disinformation!” and report posts that questioned the science behind masking, early treatment, or Covid vaccines. I remember that you did, but if you lie about it now I’ll take that as a positive sign that you are ashamed of yourself for doing it, which you should be.

If you don’t know about Dr Peter McCullough, Dr Meryl Nass, Dr Mike Yeadon, Dr John Ionedes, Dr Stefanie Senneff, Dr Sherry Tenpenny, and Dr Joseph Mercola, you need to hear what they have to say. You need to read some books too.

5. Since when is it OK to censor opposing opinions? The right of Free Speech and freedom of expression are not just foundational to our democracy, they’re essential to the functioning of any free society. Without free speech and freedom of expression and an open and free press, we are nothing but livestock awaiting slaughter. That’s no joke!

Hundreds of thousands of Americans died because we let official propaganda eclipse the free press for just a couple of years. Remember that many of those opposing views that got censored, banned, de-platformed, smeared and refuted by online “fact-checkers” turned out to be true, while the “Trusted News” services all lied, repeatedly and demonstrably, as they continue to do.

6. Why would you give someone permission to inject you with an experimental drug with a secret ingredient list, and sign a waiver stating that you agree to hold them blameless? Would you do that for me? Would you name me as beneficiary in your will first?

I realize that everyone was frightened when this went down, but we’ve had a little time to collect our wits again, and it’s very important that we face the reality of what just happened. We need to understand that we now live in an information minefield and that nothing we see online or in the media, least of all the official story, is quite what it appears. It’s time we take stock of what happened to us, and how we were manipulated, because we can’t afford to be sitting duck again.

Censored by The Indie

I submitted this letter to the Humboldt Indie, my local paper, twice. I received no response from staff, nor was the letter printed in the paper. I don’t know why I even bother anymore.

Dear Editor,

I do appreciate that The Indie provides me with free dry kindling each week, however, your coverage of the pandemic really burns me up.

Once upon a time, Kelly Lincoln promised a report about the documents Pfizer was forced to release under a court order stemming from an FOIA request. That report never materialized, instead she gives us the same nonsensical fear-mongering spiel we get from corporate media. Worse are the editorials submitted on behalf of SoHum Health, written by people with no medical expertise, full of false claims and misleading statements with no sources sited at all. But SoHum Health’s recent ad really blew my mind.

In the ad, SoHum Health informs readers that “If you’re ages 12 and up and it’s been at least two months since you’ve had any Covid vaccine or booster, it’s time for a boost!” TWO MONTHS!

What happened to the original claim that the initial 2-jab vaccine was “absolutely safe and absolutely effective.” The original vaccine promised lifelong protection from disease and an end to the pandemic. Why didn’t it live up to those expectations? Why was no one held accountable for that? Why would we ever trust the people who told us that lie again?

By now many people in this community have taken three or four of these injections, and most of the people I know who took these injections, subsequently got sick from Covid. Some of them have gotten sick from Covid two or three times since they got “vaccinated.” If those people are not immune to Covid by now, I daresay they never will be.

A “vaccine” that requires a “booster” every two months is no vaccine at all. What the hell is it? Why does SoHum Health continue to recommend these shots even though they obviously do not prevent infection or stop the spread of disease? Most importantly, why don’t Indie reporters ever ask these questions?

Frankly, The Indie’s coverage of the pandemic has served only one purpose, and that is to undermine the credibility of both SoHum Health and The Indie. I used to respect The Indie as a reliable source of local news. I miss that. Now, I’m just thankful that it burns. As for SoHum Health, I’m simply disgusted.

Sincerely,

John Hardin

Why a Snake?

I’m working on a movie project with Myles Moscato about what it took, and who it took, to overcome half-a-century of anti-marijuana propaganda and reintroduce America to hemp. In the process, I’ve had to review a lot of old anti-drug propaganda. It’s kind of a walk down memory lane, and this memory goes back just about as far as I can remember. This was my first introduction to marijuana.

I must have been three or four the first time I saw this ad, and I’m sure I saw it hundreds of times on TV during weekday early morning cartoons. I’m sure I never heard of marijuana before I saw this ad. I remember that this ad was also the first, and only, time I ever heard of smoking corn silk, which I eventually tried. Looking back, the comparison to smoking corn silk hints of hemp’s agricultural roots. It reminded me of this old country song about cannabis:

Back to the AMA’s PSA, I understood what Tinker toys were, because I had them at the time.

I had no idea who the AMA were, but, having seen their ad, I was much more curious about their logo than I was marijuana. I liked snakes very much as a child. I remember wondering about that snake.

It only appeared briefly, but there it was, a snake, wrapped around a stick, only for a second, and with no explanation. Why a snake?

That’s one of my oldest memories. Finding this relic brought it right back. The War on Drugs was real. It was a psychological information war waged against the American people. This movie will be about what it takes to overcome a multi-billion dollar propaganda machine and change the minds of Americans.

I’m excited about this project and am eager to get it out, but I also find this old anti-drug propaganda fascinating in and of itself, both historically and rhetorically, as well as aesthetically and psychologically, but also nostalgically, because it was so integral to my early development.

Censored by the NCJ

I submitted this Letter to the Editor to the North Coast Journal last week. They did not print it. I was not at all surprised by that.

Dear Editor,

What a surprise to find two thoughtful, perceptive and spot-on letters to the editor in the NCJ last week. Both D Lamar Hudson and Amy Gustin raise important points about the newly reignited abortion debate. For the last two years, the NCJ has endorsed vaccine mandates, vaccine apartheid, and even suggested that we embrace a policy of forcibly injecting vaccine-resistant citizens against their will, all the while disparaging and censoring anyone who opposed those gross violations of human and civil rights, so it was clever rhetoric, albeit inaccurate and misleading, to attempt to frame a woman’s right to abortion in other terms, terms like “reproductive rights.”

Hudson explains why the term “reproductive rights” does not apply to abortion. A woman’s right to abortion derives from the inalienable human right of bodily sovereignty and the constitutionally guaranteed right of privacy. Unless we uphold both of these principles as sacred inviolable human rights for everyone, a woman’s right to an abortion becomes tenuous. Here’s why:

The State has an obligation to punish the taking of human life. However, the State also has an obligation to respect the rights of the accused. A woman’s bodily sovereignty gives her the right to choose to abort. Her right to privacy deprives the State of evidence that a life has been taken. That’s why a woman’s right to choose is not contingent on whether life begins at conception or birth.

Unfortunately, Amy Gustin correctly observes that the NCJ and Democrats in general have thrown bodily sovereignty and privacy under the bus in their passion to embrace intrusive Covid policies. This embrace, to quote Hannah Arendt,* “was like a political demonstration… that no such thing as inalienable rights existed and that affirmations… to the contrary were mere prejudice, hypocrisy and cowardice.” God help us.

Sincerely,

John Hardin

rom: The Origins of Totalitarianism by Hannah Arendt, Chapter 9- Decline of the Nation-State and the End of the Rights of Man, p. 269